April 24, 2013

bakerstreetsdoctor:

malwinchester:

underlordwynt:

yazzdonut:

itshiddles:

SO IN THE COMICS she’s falling off a bridge and he catches her to try to save her with his spider web, but her body is forced into an unnatural position and she snaps her neck. And as he’s reeling her body back, he’s still making wise-cracks about how much he loves his powers at the moment, because he saved her. And then he realises that she’s dead.

image

oMGF THAT”S HORRIBLE

No, that’s physics.

COMICS: where we’ll routinely defy laws of physics in order to contort women into impossible, anatomically incorrect shapes so we can better objectify them, then pretend physics matters when we’re shoving women into the fridge

(via citreum)

April 24, 2013
"Amongst the worst of these [poor decisions] is the transition of Tina from a likable, shy, talented young woman to a shrill bitch inexplicably besotted with Blaine. Unlikely pairings worked in the earlier seasons of Glee because the audience was still getting to know the characters. Puck and Mercedes’ brief spell as a couple, for instance, was amusing. But in the fourth season, with characters that have been around a while, it is merely lazy and ludicrous. Ryan Murphy & company mix and match the couples like they were so many Lego building blocks; props used to fit the story rather than characters who drive the story. The unpopular pairing of Brittany and Sam illustrates this perfectly. In order to make them a couple, they broke up two inter-racial couples, one of them a queer couple, so that two blondes could mingle & party like it’s 1955."

— tinlizard20, “Glee of the Living Dead, Part 2” (via gleerant)

(via patchfire)

4:52pm  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZzuRayjSXyRB
(View comments  
Filed under: meta glee ugh why 
April 23, 2013
strike the specter's bargain

neverfeedthesarcophagi:

notbecauseofvictories:

image

[made rebloggable by request]

I am not watching Hannibal, anon, and will not be. Partly because I don’t think I can enjoy any narrative where Faust is giving in not just to Mephistopheles, but the evil within him—and this is celebrated as a virtuous realization of his real self, a shedding of the needless and arbitrary morality of mankind and ascending to one’s true power and strength. I’ve seen way too many gifsets with beautifully-written tags about how the audience can’t wait until Will stops resisting, stops clinging to his veneer of civilization and just lets himself be like Hannibal, lets himself be what he is. And every time I just want to claw out of my skin, because—how dareyou make that beautiful, make it heroic, even in the name of making the audience complicit in the horror. Lay out the temptation, if you like, make the blood a shiny apple-red and the women’s throats white as Bathsheba’s in the moonlight, make Lector’s face as inscrutable as the face of God and as fair as Lucifer’s, but don’t you dare, not for a second, discuss Will’s surrender to it as anything but a fall from grace and goodness. The apple-red of those women’s torn throats demands you acknowledge the horror for what it is.

#I am really not comfortable with this show and the way it has been recieved by the tumblr community  #since when is giving in to your desire to do violence; your unconcern for humanity and lust for their blood; considered the greatest height  #to which a hero can aspire?  #we resist these things; we defy them  #in the face of nihilism we love; in the face of the moral abyss we build shining towers of rules  #these are not arbitrary things; we invent equality with them; we invent safety and protection and peace  #I am so tired of men with cheekbones and aesthetically appealing shows being allowed to draw from this vein of false anarchy  #which in turn looks a lot like might-makes-right; it looks like neoliberalism; it looks a lot like Darwinism  #but with the blood of women on its hands (notbecauseofvictories)

To start: thanks, Sarah, for writing this. This is good. Needs to be said.

I have no stake in this discussion because I’m not watching Hannibal and as much as I love gay serial killers and their fandoms, I don’t really have time to start right now. BUT i want to throw in for this comment specifically:  I am really not comfortable with this show and the way it has been received by the tuhavmblr community; since when is giving in to your desire to do violence, your unconcern for humanity and lust for their blood, considered the greatest height to which a hero can aspire?”

Uh, since Holden Caulfield? Since A Clockwork Orange? Since Light’s cult fanbase grows into a worldwide religion in Death Note, since Fight Club*, since The Usual Suspects, since Trainspotting, since Natural Born Killers, since Thelma and Louise, since Bonnie and Clyde, since Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, since Rebel Without a Cause, since about 8 different Hitchcock films, since American Psycho, since every Tarantino film, since Kurosawa’s Cure (which EXPLICITLY spells out this theme with regard to ambiguously gay serial killers and their pursuant detectives), since Clarice runs off with Hannibal at the end of Hannibal, since every story/novel/movie ever where we glorify the anti-hero?

* See Film Critic Hulk’s excellent takedown of Fight Club and why its ultimate condemnation of nihilistic badassery is a total cop-out stuck onto a movie that completely glorifies the antihero in every way, so that all the real-life fight clubs that have sprung up in its wake aren’t so much missing the point of the film so much as responding to its clarion call for anarchistic freedom through violence.

The critique of this series’ misogyny unfortunately lines up with nearly every cop show and procedural show ever to exist, in that they universally fill their body counts with young dead white girls over every other demographic. I think it’s a separate critique from this series’ portrayal of the hero/antihero dynamic.  It’s a universal problematic truth that the bad boy is the ultimate sex symbol, and we’ve been conditioned from birth to want him, love him, admire him, want to be him, want to fuck him, even when he’s threatening to kill us, even when he makes us eat our own brains and like it. Fandom deals in rape fantasies and skeevy consent issues and the glorification of the character the text tells us we’re supposed to abhor (Snape, Draco, Tyler Durden, Hannibal Lecter) because there’s something hidden in these tropes that many of us respond to, for all kinds of different reasons, even though they are often problematic. Our love for a flawed trope, on Tumblr and off, is not really a bad thing, and there’s nothing that says that a generally flawed trope can’t be executed in subversive ways, or that we, as fandom, can’t explore that trope in subversive ways on our own, while still acknowledging its flaws, and still enjoying it anyway. :)

April 22, 2013
in re: fanfic, the difference between infringement and plagiarism

So I got asked by a reader to explain why publishing fanfiction based on someone else’s characters and words wasn’t plagiarism. i asked if I could share my answer publicly and they granted me permission. I’ve edited my original response for a bit more clarity, but as always I have to remind everybody that I’m not a lawyer; these are my opinions, purely based on my understanding of U.S. copyright law and the practice of recursive writing throughout history up through the current U.S. publishing climate. None of what I’m saying holds true for countries other than the U.S., and in fact in some countries you could go to jail even for writing free fanfiction, so please proceed with caution, and if you need an actual lawyer, please consult an OTW near you. And if I say anything that contradicts current copyright law and practice, please feel free to correct me! The last thing I want to do is spread misinformation.

I think that what a lot of people do in this argument is to conflate “plagiarism” with “infringement.” They aren’t synonymous. Infringement certainly encompasses plagiarism, but plagiarism is not synonymous with infringement.

Plagiarism deals with directly lifting other people’s words, images, or specific ideas, repackaging them a little, and passing them off as your own. You can plagiarize someone else without ever lifting a finger towards publication or profit. That is, there isn’t a direct connection between the act of stealing someone else’s words and passing them off as your own, and the act of trying to publish/get paid for those words.

So the question of when/how you can profit from fanwork is never about plagiarism, but about infringement. And whether the work infringes or not depends on whether it can successfully fit the criteria established by the fair use clause of U.S. copyright law. 

Read More

April 14, 2013

Anonymous asked: can you please talk about whiskyrunner's fics? I saw people mentioned them as if they're badly written. I read some and found them quite entertaining and addictive but I would love to hear your opinion! Is there any sexist, misogynist or negative subtext that upset you? I'm slow to these stuffs and feel kind of silly right now..

Hi, anon from the beginning of March! *sob*  I haven’t read a lot of whisky’s fics because they get too angsty for me, so I can’t really speak to their quality or whatever.  From what little I have read, her fics are very melodramatic, and sometimes melodrama without a lot of nuance can lead to stereotyped characterizations or situations. I did feel like the one where Arthur was extremely closeted and had a lot of internalized homophobia was a little too melodramatic and cliched a characterization for me, but I don’t think I’d call it a negative subtext because it’s one that’s real for a lot of people. Also, I haven’t read all of the Pavlov’s bell verse, but I thought what I read was really cute-slash-hot, and I thought she did a decent job exploring all the consent / possessiveness issues that she developed. I don’t really remember any women being present in those stories but it’s been at least a year + since I’ve read them, so my memory is very fuzzy.

EDIT: ahaha okay one of my friends just screamed at me AJA HOW COULD YOU FORGET THAT TIME THAT ARTHUR GOT PREGNANT IN WHISKY’S FIC AND THEN ARIADNE SHOWED UP AND HAD THE BABIES IMPLANTED IN HER TO CARRY THEM TO TERM AND THEN COMPLETELY DISAPPEARED

which apparently happened in pavlov’s bell but which i don’t remember at all lolol but maybe i didn’t get that far? SOBBING OKAY THAT’S NOT REALLY COOL AT ALL.

I am not sure if that was helpful, but in general, if you’re asking questions about what you’re reading and how it portrays women, you’re bound to sniff out any problematic subtext without my help! And I imagine whisky herself would have interesting thoughts on this topic!

April 14, 2013

theoneandonlylobster asked: Can I add to your fanfic post that The Hunger Games is massively inspired by the myth of Theseus and the Minotaur? In that myth, every seven years, seven Athenian boys and seven Athenian girls had to be to be sent to Crete to be devoured by the Minotaur in Daedalus's Labyrinth. Or are you no longer taking submissions on that post?

Hi! :D Yes! I am definitely always still taking submissions, preferably via my LiveJournal post because it’s easier to organize (and it’s desperately overdue an update), and that’s a great point about the Hunger Games.

In general, though, I’ve tried to stay pretty narrow in terms of what I allow onto the list, because I think if you start going the “inspired by” route then it’s easy to ruin the argument as it specifically relates to the practice of writing fanfiction, because literally everything is *inspired* by everything else. Harry Potter is inspired by Henry V and the life of Christ, The Lion King is inspired by Hamlet; but even though a lot of people call The Lion King a Hamlet fanfic, it’s not that simple because the people who wrote the Lion King didn’t set out to create a Hamlet fanfic (though you could argue they did set out to write fanfic of Osamu Tezuka’s Kimba the White Lion and wound up plagiarizing instead).

In the same way it’s clear Suzanne Collins was aware of the mythology upon which she drew, and it’s important to talk about that, but she didn’t set out to expand, elaborate, or retell the story of Theseus and Ariadne, no more than Nolan did in Inception, even though they both draw upon that myth for inspiration.

I tend to try to exclude things that *reference* earlier myths and stories but don’t explicitly retell them deliberately. Even though R & Jules in Warm Bodies are meant to be Romeo and Juliet, that’s as explicit as the similarities between those two stories get, so I don’t think it belongs on the list of published fanfic.

With that list, the point I’m trying to make is that people have been writing fanfiction, explicitly returning to previous stories and retelling / expanding / reimagining those stories for centuries, as well as drawing on them to make new ones with mostly new plots and new characters. For the sake of keeping my argument strong, I try to limit the list to the first practice and not the second, though it does get tricky sometimes and I welcome debate about what should/shouldn’t be on it. :)

Thank you for asking!

April 10, 2013

albinwonderland:

gingerhaze:

Look, I get it and I used to be one of those people, who was like “I don’t hate women I just hate every female character because they’re written badly!” or whatever and like

I want you to spend some time really honestly thinking about why you hate those characters so much

I had a friend who HATED Ana Lucia from LOST, HATED her, and I was like “why do you hate her?” and she was like “She’s bossy!” and I was like “if she was a bossy dude would you still hate her?” and she stopped and thought and then said no.

You don’t have to like or accept every female character obviously, I’m just asking you to be honest with yourself about your reasons for not liking them.

I have to be hard on myself about this too. Even recently, it’s like “If Lori was a man, would I be so annoyed with her? If Andrea was a man, would I find her this frustrating?”

I think we’re a lot harder on female characters without even realizing it, simply because they’re female. I catch myself doing it all the time. It’s a subconscious thing. It’s something I’m actively trying to work on.

i think we always have to actively work on it. it’s just so hard to unlearn knee-jerk reactions of dislike/distrust/jealousy/resentfulness/competitiveness/belittling tendencies towards other women, even and especially female characters, because society has so long only presented women to other women as competition for the interest of a man, and we’ve been taught to frame our own interactions with other women this way, and it’s shit.

(also gingerhaze is awesome, but i didn’t need to tell you that)

(via crown-of-weeds)

April 10, 2013

airspaniel:

therealfoxxcub:

infiniteeight8:

shippingallthegay:

So, for reasons I don’t feel like explaining right now, I have 5 copies of a book, 770 pages long, that consists solely of Steve Rogers/Tony Stark fan fiction. That is four more copies than I actually need, so I figured, giveaway time…? [snip]

Contains:

(I had to throw out When The Lights Go On Again by seanchai and elspethedixon due to page number constraints, which completely gutted me because it’s one of my personal favorites. GO READ IT! IT’S SO GOOD! GOOD GOD, JUST GO!)

THIS IS NOT OKAY.

She is not just giving this away, she is also is selling this anthology. I know several of the authors collected here personally and despite saying that she got permission from all of them, she definitely didn’t. Two people give blanket permission that is NOT intended for commercial use (selling it counts), and one person uses a non-commercial creative commons license, at the least. Edit: And one person flat out did not give permission at all. End Edit. All three four of these people have public, easily found, active e-mail addresses attached to the stories.

In addition, the five free copies were created by abusing the NaNoWriMo system — she used the NaNoWriMo winners code to get create space to produce five copies of work that is not hers.

Plus CreateSpace specifies no X-rated content in their terms of service, and several of those stories feature graphic sex scenes.

She fully intends to do this again, as witnessed by the tags to this giveaway.

This NOT OKAY people.

[snip snip]

Things like this happen all the time, sadly—Amazon’s self-publishing outlet, for example, is notorious for hosting works that are filched examples of fanfiction, and some of us may have works that are right now being sold on a self-publish website that someone else is claiming to have written. We’ll never know unless someone calls the sellers on it and notifies us.

I think the main reason things like this keep happening, apart from blatant theft, is the idea that fanfiction isn’t under copyright and is automatically public domain. The idea that people seem to have that if I write something, or draw something, it’s fair game for anyone to take and duplicate. Not transform, which is the criteria that protects all fanfic, but straight-up reproduce and sell. That’s what this person did—and for context, here’s her apology with comments.

But it’s also what Disney did to Katie Woodger. And without knowing why, I can only assume someone working for Disney equated fanart with “free for your own use.” That’s not how copyright works, even if you’re talking about fanwork.

Creative Commons licenses are your friends. If you don’t explicitly license your copyrighted work under a creative commons license, then you retain all the rights to that work that fall outside of fair use. The licenses that gives you the freedom to let people remix and transform your work also give you the power to deny someone else’s filching of your work for their own purposes, as this post illustrates beautifully.

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »